-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 280
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Suggestion to extend CODEOWNERS with new contributor #720
Closed
derberg opened this issue
Feb 10, 2022
· 5 comments
· Fixed by #723 or asyncapi/spec-json-schemas#173
Closed
Suggestion to extend CODEOWNERS with new contributor #720
derberg opened this issue
Feb 10, 2022
· 5 comments
· Fixed by #723 or asyncapi/spec-json-schemas#173
Comments
Huge YES from my side |
That's very kind, I'd love to - thank you! |
This was referenced Feb 14, 2022
PRs created ☝️ |
🎉 This issue has been resolved in version 2.3.1-2022-04-release.1 🎉 The release is available on GitHub release Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀 |
🎉 This issue has been resolved in version 2.4.0 🎉 The release is available on GitHub release Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
@fmvilas I'd like to propose we extend list of codeowners for the specification and the json schema repo. I hope @dalelane agrees 🙏🏼
@dalelane, even though affiliated with IBM, demonstrated several times that he is a great community member and helped in many specification-related works that were not directly beneficial only to IBM. What I mean is that from my perspective Dale demonstrated he can be trusted to help in spec maintenance for the good of the community and not the company he works for:
Technically speaking, @fmvilas I'd love to have Dale as codeowner:
@dalelane I hope you accept 🙏🏼 I personally would be honored 🍺
P.S. I summarized your achievements for the first time while writing this issue. I have to say you raised a bar for new potential code owners pretty high 😆 and I bet I did not mention all topics
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: