[generalized validation] Generate code validation rules based on spec for every supported language

[slavaGanzin]

Why do we need this improvement?

Spec is great, but if it's validated on a gateway level it creates possibility of developer sending message and gateway silently rejecting it. Plus, when there is a version difference between validation (on a gateway) and a client (on developer side) it could create situations where developer sending proper message (according to his spec) and gateway rejecting it. This decrease development cycle speed

How will this change help?

Developer will get exception immediately after passing wrong arguments.

Screenshots

No response

How could it be implemented/designed?

There is pydantic rules for python already, but for JS/TS this could be done with https://github.com/colinhacks/zod or as it's done in glee with ajv: https://github.com/asyncapi/glee/blob/897d7a81946897c00b6db87ca879d308ae13d914/src/lib/util.ts#L101. It doesn't matter, but this feature should be cross-language.

I don't like that you need to enable them per language with different options, that's crazy. I was expecting that you'll have just one argument --no-validation that will disable automatic validation rules generation, and if it's not present validation rules should be forced into models. For real, there is no use for models if I can put any garbage into them.

p.s. I don't want to rise another issue, but why spec descriptions is not present in models? In languages like python, it will bring you intellisense for free

🚧 Breaking changes

Yes

👀 Have you checked for similar open issues?

• I checked and didn't find a similar issue

🏢 Have you read the Contributing Guidelines?

• I have read the Contributing Guidelines

Are you willing to work on this issue?

Yes I am willing to submit a PR!

[github-actions]

Welcome to AsyncAPI. Thanks a lot for reporting your first issue. Please check out our contributors guide and the instructions about a basic recommended setup useful for opening a pull request.
Keep in mind there are also other channels you can use to interact with AsyncAPI community. For more details check out this issue.

[github-actions]

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity 😴

It will be closed in 120 days if no further activity occurs. To unstale this issue, add a comment with a detailed explanation.

There can be many reasons why some specific issue has no activity. The most probable cause is lack of time, not lack of interest. AsyncAPI Initiative is a Linux Foundation project not owned by a single for-profit company. It is a community-driven initiative ruled under open governance model.

Let us figure out together how to push this issue forward. Connect with us through one of many communication channels we established here.

Thank you for your patience ❤️