You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
So far the scholix model as well as the main scope of our projects considers events of type:
[object] [relation] [object] ([action]), e.g.: "DOI cites URL (created)" or "bibcode cites DOI (deleted)". As mentioned here #1 relation events need to specify "create/delete" event type.
Should we consider another type of events which are describing a single object events? e.g.: [object] ([action]), e.g.:
"DOI (created)", "DOI (deactivated)" or "URL (changed)"
Those would not be useful for citations, but might serve cases where a subscriber to the broker can be informed for example of "all software published on Zenodo", or all new bibcodes minted by ADS etc...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@astrofrog@lnielsen We will be discussing this in the morning (10/12) because we are concerned/confused about how we will populate the broker database with entities for which there are no events in the stream. If that population requires an event then it requires a schema and now is the time to design one or at least to mock such an event.
So far the scholix model as well as the main scope of our projects considers events of type:
[object] [relation] [object] ([action]), e.g.: "DOI cites URL (created)" or "bibcode cites DOI (deleted)". As mentioned here #1 relation events need to specify "create/delete" event type.
Should we consider another type of events which are describing a single object events? e.g.:
[object] ([action]), e.g.:
"DOI (created)", "DOI (deactivated)" or "URL (changed)"
Those would not be useful for citations, but might serve cases where a subscriber to the broker can be informed for example of "all software published on Zenodo", or all new bibcodes minted by ADS etc...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: