You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I think that these are two good practices that we should also do for the provisioning plugin.
A better set of git commits lead to a better upstream developer experience. For external contributors, a history containing enough information is key to understand the evolution of the code base. For us it will help solving the future bugs we will have to fix, mainly for the same reasons.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
On the operator there is a constraint so that every commit is linked to an issue (or to explicitly tell that there are no related issues):
On the broker, there are constraints on the actual commit format:
I think that these are two good practices that we should also do for the provisioning plugin.
A better set of git commits lead to a better upstream developer experience. For external contributors, a history containing enough information is key to understand the evolution of the code base. For us it will help solving the future bugs we will have to fix, mainly for the same reasons.
What's your opinion on the subject?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions