Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Categorized strategy doesn't work with Surefire 2.21.0 #328

Open
bartoszmajsak opened this issue Apr 4, 2018 · 0 comments
Open

Categorized strategy doesn't work with Surefire 2.21.0 #328

bartoszmajsak opened this issue Apr 4, 2018 · 0 comments

Comments

@bartoszmajsak
Copy link
Member

When updating Smart Testing from 2.19.1 to 2.21.0, besides minor code changes in tests, categorized strategy is not working anymore (or at least there is one failing categorized test CategorizedTestSelectionFunctionalTests#should_run_test_with_categories_loader_and_service.

Results in:

java.lang.AssertionError: 
Actual and expected should have same size but actual size is:
 <4>
while expected is:
 <1>
Actual was:
<[TestResult{className='org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.loadable.JavaSPIExtensionLoaderTestCase', testMethod='*', result=PASSED},
    TestResult{className='org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.loadable.ServiceRegistryLoaderTestCase', testMethod='*', result=PASSED},
    TestResult{className='org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.loadable.ServiceRegistryTestCase', testMethod='*', result=PASSED},
    TestResult{className='org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.loadable.LoadableExtensionLoaderTestCase', testMethod='*', result=PASSED}]>
	at org.arquillian.smart.testing.ftest.categorized.CategorizedTestSelectionFunctionalTests.should_run_test_with_categories_loader_and_service(CategorizedTestSelectionFunctionalTests.java:59)
	at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
	at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
	at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
	at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
	at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:50)
	at org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12)
	at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:47)
	at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:17)
	at org.arquillian.smart.testing.rules.TestBed$1.evaluate(TestBed.java:54)
	at org.junit.rules.RunRules.evaluate(RunRules.java:20)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:325)
	at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:78)
	at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:57)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:290)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:71)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:288)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:58)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:268)
	at org.junit.rules.ExternalResource$1.evaluate(ExternalResource.java:48)
	at org.junit.rules.RunRules.evaluate(RunRules.java:20)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:363)
	at org.junit.runner.JUnitCore.run(JUnitCore.java:137)
	at com.intellij.junit4.JUnit4IdeaTestRunner.startRunnerWithArgs(JUnit4IdeaTestRunner.java:68)
	at com.intellij.rt.execution.junit.IdeaTestRunner$Repeater.startRunnerWithArgs(IdeaTestRunner.java:47)
	at com.intellij.rt.execution.junit.JUnitStarter.prepareStreamsAndStart(JUnitStarter.java:242)
	at com.intellij.rt.execution.junit.JUnitStarter.main(JUnitStarter.java:70)

BTW it should be renamed from CategorizedTestSelectionFunctionalTests to CategorizedTestSelectionFunctionalTest.

Bumping Surefire to 2.21.0 in the dogfooding repository results with the same error.

Basic changes available in https://github.com/arquillian/smart-testing/tree/surefire_2.21.0

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant