Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Q&V: ceramics preprocessing and fragments #2381

Closed
Tracked by #2695
urapadmin opened this issue Nov 9, 2023 · 18 comments
Closed
Tracked by #2695

Q&V: ceramics preprocessing and fragments #2381

urapadmin opened this issue Nov 9, 2023 · 18 comments
Assignees
Labels
kiosk a kiosk issue (not a filemaker issue)
Milestone

Comments

@urapadmin
Copy link
Collaborator

urapadmin commented Nov 9, 2023

the collected material view needs an update.
BUT: This should only happen in projects that have fragments and preprocessing, so currently only in PASU!

@urapadmin urapadmin converted this from a draft issue Nov 9, 2023
@urapadmin urapadmin added the kiosk a kiosk issue (not a filemaker issue) label Nov 9, 2023
@urapadmin urapadmin added this to the Kiosk 1.6 milestone Nov 9, 2023
@urapadmin urapadmin removed the status in query & view Nov 9, 2023
@urapadmin urapadmin moved this to Todo in query & view Mar 27, 2024
@urapadmin urapadmin modified the milestones: Kiosk 1.6, pasu 2024 May 16, 2024
@urapadmin
Copy link
Collaborator Author

urapadmin commented May 27, 2024

kiosk 1.5.39.1

@urapadmin urapadmin changed the title Q&V: su ceramics Q&V: ceramics preprocessing May 27, 2024
@urapadmin
Copy link
Collaborator Author

urapadmin commented May 27, 2024

  • see also Q&V: su fragment analysis #2382 for the ceramic fragments
  • please check if this is complete and shows the same number of records and the same data as the recording app

@urapadmin urapadmin changed the title Q&V: ceramics preprocessing Q&V: ceramics preprocessing and fragments May 27, 2024
@urapadmin
Copy link
Collaborator Author

urapadmin commented May 27, 2024

@lbestock needs to be tested on local PASU, too!

@luizaogs
Copy link
Collaborator

Somewhat related but not opening a ticket yet because I don't know if it's a problem: if a project doesn't use lots, should the field show up in Q&V? I just noticed a blank lot field when testing this in PASU:

Screenshot 2024-05-27 at 2 48 42 PM

@luizaogs
Copy link
Collaborator

luizaogs commented May 27, 2024

Weight and quantity fields look a bit wacky:

Screenshot 2024-05-27 at 2 49 45 PM

@luizaogs
Copy link
Collaborator

You're also currently missing the total count and weight, visible in the app like this:

Screenshot 2024-05-27 at 2 53 35 PM

@luizaogs
Copy link
Collaborator

I believe the rest is ok.

@urapadmin
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Somewhat related but not opening a ticket yet because I don't know if it's a problem: if a project doesn't use lots, should the field show up in Q&V? I just noticed a blank lot field when testing this in PASU:

worth a ticket

@urapadmin
Copy link
Collaborator Author

urapadmin commented May 27, 2024

Weight and quantity fields look a bit wacky:
Screenshot 2024-05-27 at 2 49 45 PM

mainly because of #2727 : Once there is a different background color for the field the right alignment gets clearer. Otherwise: by design.

@urapadmin
Copy link
Collaborator Author

You're also currently missing the total count and weight, visible in the app like this:
Screenshot 2024-05-27 at 2 53 35 PM

Those are live calculations. Can't do that in the current state of View. But the totals should be fields in the collected material section.

@luizaogs
Copy link
Collaborator

Somewhat related but not opening a ticket yet because I don't know if it's a problem: if a project doesn't use lots, should the field show up in Q&V? I just noticed a blank lot field when testing this in PASU:

worth a ticket

Done.

@urapadmin
Copy link
Collaborator Author

#2727 is out, so this look better now. #2735 should be solved, too.
Anything I skipped here?

@luizaogs
Copy link
Collaborator

No, looks fine now. Over to @lbestock for the local test.

@lbestock
Copy link
Collaborator

This looks good, and I don't have any trouble getting to quantity and weight totals from the CM. And I get the fragments right below, just as I would like. But...I do miss the graphs. We have them in Q&V for materials in general, and we have them in FM for preprocessing, but we don't have them in Q&V for preprocessing.

@lbestock
Copy link
Collaborator

All the numbers I have checked are correct. So #2738, which is a terminology issue, and my above desire for pie charts. Not sure if those mean the ticket should stay open or not.

@urapadmin
Copy link
Collaborator Author

This looks good, and I don't have any trouble getting to quantity and weight totals from the CM. And I get the fragments right below, just as I would like. But...I do miss the graphs. We have them in Q&V for materials in general, and we have them in FM for preprocessing, but we don't have them in Q&V for preprocessing.

This looks good, and I don't have any trouble getting to quantity and weight totals from the CM. And I get the fragments right below, just as I would like. But...I do miss the graphs. We have them in Q&V for materials in general, and we have them in FM for preprocessing, but we don't have them in Q&V for preprocessing.

That would be a new query (they won't appear in a view), which is feasible but please make it a new ticket.

@urapadmin
Copy link
Collaborator Author

so this can be closed then.

@luizaogs
Copy link
Collaborator

This looks good, and I don't have any trouble getting to quantity and weight totals from the CM. And I get the fragments right below, just as I would like. But...I do miss the graphs. We have them in Q&V for materials in general, and we have them in FM for preprocessing, but we don't have them in Q&V for preprocessing.

This looks good, and I don't have any trouble getting to quantity and weight totals from the CM. And I get the fragments right below, just as I would like. But...I do miss the graphs. We have them in Q&V for materials in general, and we have them in FM for preprocessing, but we don't have them in Q&V for preprocessing.

That would be a new query (they won't appear in a view), which is feasible but please make it a new ticket.

I opened this for Laurel.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kiosk a kiosk issue (not a filemaker issue)
Projects
Status: Done
Status: Closed
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants