Skip to content

LFPykit and Arbor #1806

Answered by espenhgn
brenthuisman asked this question in General
Jan 20, 2022 · 3 comments · 4 replies
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

Hi Brent,
I didn't have any immediate plans to change this example, although it could be improved somewhat:

  • Providing a modified lfpykit.CellGeometry class for dealing with the mapping of geometries of segments to the corresponding CVs, taking the place_pwlin object and location metadata as inputs. I don't think the user should have to deal with this each time in order to obtain this matrix M that is finally multiplied with the transmembrane currents from the cable_probe_total_current_cell instance.
  • I don't know how long simulation times and typical number of CVs @davbass expects, but recording transmembrane currents for the entire simulation duration could easily result in consuming all…

Replies: 3 comments 4 replies

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Answer selected by brenthuisman
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
4 replies
@espenhgn
Comment options

@brenthuisman
Comment options

@espenhgn
Comment options

@brenthuisman
Comment options

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
2 participants