Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug: cluster generator fails to parse non-ascii subject and sender #513

Open
sebbASF opened this issue Mar 16, 2020 · 2 comments
Open

Bug: cluster generator fails to parse non-ascii subject and sender #513

sebbASF opened this issue Mar 16, 2020 · 2 comments
Labels

Comments

@sebbASF
Copy link
Contributor

sebbASF commented Mar 16, 2020

The cluster generator uses fields of the msg assuming that they will be strings.

However that is not the case if non-ascii characters have been used.

In such cases, code such as msg.get('subject') will return an email.header.Header object.
This causes code such as bytes(subject, encoding = 'ascii') to fail with

TypeError: encoding without a string argument

In turn, this causes the archiver to revert to a very basic fallback mid:

    mid = hashlib.sha224(str("%s-%s" % (lid, msg_metadata['archived-at'])).encode('utf-8')).hexdigest() + "@" + (lid if lid else "none")

Unless archived-at is defined, this will be constant for a given list id

This is relatively easy to fix; the generator should use the msg_metadata dict which
the archiver has already set up.

HOWEVER, to ensure that it's possible to regenerate the same Permalinks, any fix MUST be implemented as a new generator type, with a new syntax (i.e. change the 'r' prefix).

There are probably some other changes that need to be made to the cluster generator.
For example, Message-Id should be canonicalised.

Note that the fallback mid cannot be changed, as that would affect all the generators.

@sebbASF sebbASF added the bug label Mar 16, 2020
@Humbedooh
Copy link
Member

Let's bump the 'r' prefix then. I'd suggest moving to next char, 'v' :)
So, am I understanding this right in that the generators should be passed msg_metadata instead of msg in the first variable slot, and that would address the main issue? If so, we'd probably be best off by accessing them with msg.get('subject', '') as they may not have been present in the email and this would avoid a key error.

What do you mean by message-id being canonicalized?

@sebbASF
Copy link
Contributor Author

sebbASF commented Mar 16, 2020

No, it's not possible to replace msg by msg_metadata, because that will change the output from the existing generators (at least with some input).

I was thinking of adding the metadata as another parameter.
It would only be used by the new generator(s).
This would preserve the existing behaviour.

As to canonicalisation, headers may be wrapped in transit.
For maximum portability, they should be unwrapped before use.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants