Further LLM Support

[vdwals]

Hi all,

I greatly appreciate the recent transformations added for LLM support. I started a similar implementation for customer projects and created this plugin: GitHub Link. Especially the "semantic search" was a very useful feature.

In my implementation, I introduced three new metadata types specifically tailored for LLM use cases. Now, I’m considering whether it would be beneficial to integrate my work into the main codebase and align the metadata usage, or if it’s better to continue developing it as a standalone plugin.

I’d love to hear your thoughts on this.

Best regards,
Dennis

[bamaer]

sounds great, the more functionality the better IMO. Can you check your link? It returns a 404, could it be that your repository is set to private?

[vdwals]

Apologies for the mix-up! It was set to private as I intended to finalize it before publishing. However, the latest transformations in Hop might present an exciting opportunity to revisit and enhance it further.