Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added parametrized dynamic links to use like @allure.link('{link}') or @allure.testcase('{testcase_link}') #496

Open
wants to merge 7 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Kirikami
Copy link

@Kirikami Kirikami commented Jun 15, 2020

  • Added new way to attach allure links

Context

//: # (
Currently, there is a way to use dynamic links inside test method. To have more consistency with parametrized tests and to use links in the same way as @allure.title('{parameter}') I've added another option for dynamic links which allows to use it in same way @allure.link('{parameter}')
It allows include links to test cases or to issues in prepared data for parametrized tests
)

Checklist

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Jun 15, 2020

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

@Kirikami Kirikami changed the title Added parametrized dynamic links to use like @allure.link('{test.link}' Added parametrized dynamic links to use like @allure.link('{test.link}') Jun 15, 2020
@Kirikami Kirikami changed the title Added parametrized dynamic links to use like @allure.link('{test.link}') Added parametrized dynamic links to use like @allure.link('{link}') or @allure.testcase('{testcase_link'}) Jun 15, 2020
@Kirikami Kirikami changed the title Added parametrized dynamic links to use like @allure.link('{link}') or @allure.testcase('{testcase_link'}) Added parametrized dynamic links to use like @allure.link('{link}') or @allure.testcase('{testcase_link}') Jun 15, 2020
@Kirikami
Copy link
Author

Kirikami commented Jul 2, 2020

Looks like there are some problems with allure-pytest-bdd since I was editing only allure pytest files and the previous PR has the same issue as this one. Please let me know if this PR can be merged (would be nicer to have this functionality in my case but might not make much sense to other users) or simply discarded and closed

@Kirikami
Copy link
Author

Hey @skhomuti, apologies for bothering, is it possible to merge this change or close PR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants