-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Metadata : abstract #236
Comments
Strangely the 2 properties come from DCT. Dublin Core might have judge that they could be potentially useful. So I did certainly in 2016. Abstract | DCTERMS: A summary of the resource. Description | DCTERMS: An account of the resource. Description may include but is not limited to: an abstract, a table of contents, a graphical representation, or a free-text account of the resource.OMV: Free text description of an ontology. In AgroPortal, We have been using the abstract field several times: Could you revise and precise your opinion? |
Looking at data shows that people tend to provide more detailed information in Abstract. |
Oui tout cela sera capturer dans le retactoring de la page Summary; ontoportal-lirmm/bioportal_web_ui#75 |
Is it? if no . Please refine the work to be done, in a list of requirements. |
I was kind of ok to remove this property (at least from AgroPortal) untill I look a @hibadjebabria169 figure: Values in AgroPortal: http://data.agroportal.lirmm.fr/submissions?&display=abstract => I would then leave it like this for now. Untill we have another set of remarks. In the new UI abstract will not be part of the main properties. |
What would be the difference between "abstract" and "description" ?
What information is expected in each ?
I'd suggest removing "abstract" which brings confusion
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: