Services keyword references datasets

[archaeogeek]

Corresponding elements in other standards - again a reference to ISO 19115:2003 MD_Identification
Encoding guidance - example 5. Should this be dropped as it is not to be used?

[nmtoken]

Isn't the point of the guidance to say what not to use, just as much as what to use, as per the note:

The srv:SV_ServiceIdentification XML element has an optional property srv:keywords which exhibits the same behaviour as gmd:descriptiveKeywords. Consequently keywords for service metadata could be encoded in the way shown in Example Five. This approach shall not be followed in GEMINI2 metadata instances

[PeterParslow]

Regarding 'corresponding element in other standards', again this is because 'descriptiveKeywords' is a property of MD_Metadata, inherited by both ISO 19115:2003 MD_DataIdentification and ISO 19119:2005 SV_ServiceIdentification

Regarding "example 5": this no longer seems to exist (in either datasets of services)

[nmtoken]

Example 5 was:

 Example Five (services) - keywords in the srv namespace (this encoding is not to be used)

 <gmd:MD_Metadata>
  ...
  <gmd:identificationInfo>
    <srv:SV_ServiceIdentification>
      ...
      <srv:keywords>
        <gmd:MD_Keywords>
          <gmd:keyword>
            <gco:CharacterString>humanCatalogueViewer</gco:CharacterString>
          </gmd:keyword>
        </gmd:MD_Keywords>
      </srv:keywords>
      ...
    </srv:SV_ServiceIdentification>
  </gmd:identificationInfo>
  ...
</gmd:MD_Metadata>