Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

drop services equivalent scale element #119

Open
archaeogeek opened this issue Oct 10, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

drop services equivalent scale element #119

archaeogeek opened this issue Oct 10, 2023 · 2 comments
Labels
Encoding Issues that would affect the XML encoding Guidance Issues that primarily affect the general or element guidance, not the "normative" parts

Comments

@archaeogeek
Copy link
Member

Should probably be dropped as an element for services as encoding guidelines specify spatial resolution shall be expressed in the Abstract for services.
@archaeogeek archaeogeek added Guidance Issues that primarily affect the general or element guidance, not the "normative" parts Encoding Issues that would affect the XML encoding labels Oct 10, 2023
@nmtoken
Copy link
Contributor

nmtoken commented Oct 10, 2023 •
edited
Loading

On balance I would keep it, even though there is no element in ISO 19139 beyond the abstract, because according to the guidance there is a conditionality to supply the information

obligation | Conditional - for datasets and dataset series where a resolution distance can be specified and for services where there is a restriction on the spatial resolution of the service

@archaeogeek
Copy link
Member Author

I vote this issue is closed based on @nmtoken's comment above?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Encoding Issues that would affect the XML encoding Guidance Issues that primarily affect the general or element guidance, not the "normative" parts
Projects
GEMINI issue handling
Status: To do
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@archaeogeek @nmtoken