Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Method selection decision tree #34

Open
drpaulralph opened this issue Jun 9, 2021 · 3 comments
Open

Method selection decision tree #34

drpaulralph opened this issue Jun 9, 2021 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation

Comments

@drpaulralph
Copy link
Collaborator

Create a flow chart or decision tree to help users determine which standard(s) to select. (Suggestions welcome).

@drpaulralph drpaulralph added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Jun 9, 2021
@drpaulralph drpaulralph self-assigned this Jun 9, 2021
@rindPHI
Copy link

rindPHI commented Jun 9, 2021

Do you know about any kind of statistics about how frequently a given research method occurs in practice? For instance, Engineering Research could apply for much more empirical SE papers than, e.g., Quantitative Simulation. In that case, one should begin the decision tree with a question regarding the characteristics of Engineering Research rather than Quantitative Simulation.

@drpaulralph
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Many SLRs classify primary studies in terms of methods used, and I think there's an ICSE paper that classifies all the ICSE papers for several years, but you have to take it all with a grain of salt because many, many SE papers misrepresent the methods they're using. Quantitative simulations are often referred to as "experiments" or "case studies". Action research is rarely called action research. Engineering research is typically mislabled "design research" (don't get me started on this). Qualitative surveys are often mislabeled as grounded theory, etc.

@rindPHI
Copy link

rindPHI commented Jun 9, 2021

I see 😬 Still, such a classification could be useful for designing the decision tree; it won't make it incorrect, rather influence its structure. I just sent 10 minutes trying to find that ICSE paper you mentioned, unfortunately unsuccessful. If I find some time, I'll continue the search and maybe draft a decision tree, but can't promise anything ;)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants