diff --git a/_config.yml b/_config.yml index 2cf5600..7f7b4fe 100644 --- a/_config.yml +++ b/_config.yml @@ -8,7 +8,8 @@ header_pages: - tab_03_standards.md - tab_04_supplements.md - tab_05_faq.md - - tab_06_people.md + - tab_06_glossary.md + - tab_07_people.md collections: team: output: true diff --git a/docs/standards/ActionResearch.md b/docs/standards/ActionResearch.md index 0af63dd..86d47f2 100644 --- a/docs/standards/ActionResearch.md +++ b/docs/standards/ActionResearch.md @@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ standards. ## General Quality Criteria Example criteria include reflexivity, credibility, resonance, usefulness -and transferability (see **Glossary**). Positivist quality criteria such +and transferability (see [Glossary](../glossary)). Positivist quality criteria such as internal validity, construct validity, generalizability and reliability typically do not apply. diff --git a/docs/standards/CaseStudy.md b/docs/standards/CaseStudy.md index 739a93b..5473782 100644 --- a/docs/standards/CaseStudy.md +++ b/docs/standards/CaseStudy.md @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ captures a large quantitative dataset with limited context, consider the Case studies should be evaluated using qualitative validity criteria such as credibility, multivocality, reflexivity, rigor and -transferability (see **Glossary**). Quantitative quality criteria such +transferability (see [Glossary](../glossary)). Quantitative quality criteria such as replicability, generalizability and objectivity typically do not apply. diff --git a/docs/standards/GroundedTheory.md b/docs/standards/GroundedTheory.md index f432d80..c67a5be 100644 --- a/docs/standards/GroundedTheory.md +++ b/docs/standards/GroundedTheory.md @@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ collection and analysis or do not use theoretical sampling, consider the ## Quality Criteria Glaser, Strauss, Corbin and Charmaz advance inconsistent quality -criteria. Using definitions in our **Glossary**, reviewers should +criteria. Using definitions in our [Glossary](../glossary), reviewers should consider common qualitative criteria such as **credibility**, **resonance**, **usefulness** and the degree to which results *extend* our cumulative knowledge. Quantitative quality criteria such as internal diff --git a/docs/standards/OptimizationStudies.md b/docs/standards/OptimizationStudies.md index f8bb579..c4d583c 100644 --- a/docs/standards/OptimizationStudies.md +++ b/docs/standards/OptimizationStudies.md @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ We stress that the use of optimization in SE is still a rapidly evolving field. ## General Quality Criteria -The most valuable quality criteria for optimization studies in SE include reliability, replicability, reproducibility, rigor, and usefulness (see **Glossary**). +The most valuable quality criteria for optimization studies in SE include reliability, replicability, reproducibility, rigor, and usefulness (see [Glossary](../glossary)). ## Examples of Acceptable Deviations diff --git a/docs/standards/QualitativeSurveys.md b/docs/standards/QualitativeSurveys.md index 5c24ff0..e1a884e 100644 --- a/docs/standards/QualitativeSurveys.md +++ b/docs/standards/QualitativeSurveys.md @@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ consider the **Discourse Analysis Standard (not yet available)**. An interview study should address appropriate qualitative quality criteria such as: **credibility,** **resonance**, **usefulness**, and -**transferability** (see [Glossary](https://github.com/acmsigsoft/EmpiricalStandards/blob/master/docs/supplements/Glossary.md)). Quantitative quality criteria +**transferability** (see [Glossary](../glossary)). Quantitative quality criteria such as internal validity, construct validity, generalizability and reliability typically do not apply. diff --git a/docs/standards/QuestionnaireSurveys.md b/docs/standards/QuestionnaireSurveys.md index 8173dc4..bc72633 100644 --- a/docs/standards/QuestionnaireSurveys.md +++ b/docs/standards/QuestionnaireSurveys.md @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ typically given to participants in controlled experiments (see the Survey studies should address quantitative quality criteria such asĀ **internal validity**, **construct validity**, **external validity**, -**reliability** and **objectivity** (see **Glossary**). +**reliability** and **objectivity** (see [Glossary](../glossary)). ## Variations diff --git a/docs/standards/Replication.md b/docs/standards/Replication.md index 8dd7f71..4d5f52e 100644 --- a/docs/standards/Replication.md +++ b/docs/standards/Replication.md @@ -15,9 +15,9 @@ This standard applies to empirical studies that meet the following criteria: ## Definitions -To _[reproduce](/docs/supplements/Glossary.md#reproducibility)_ means to repeat the original study's data analysis on the original study's data. +To _[reproduce](../glossary#reproducibility)_ means to repeat the original study's data analysis on the original study's data. -To _[replicate](/docs/supplements/Glossary.md#replicability)_ means to repeat a study by collecting new data and repeating the original study's analysis on the new data. +To _[replicate](../glossary#replicability)_ means to repeat a study by collecting new data and repeating the original study's analysis on the new data. ## Specific Attributes diff --git a/tab_04_supplements.md b/tab_04_supplements.md index 89927a8..87a642a 100644 --- a/tab_04_supplements.md +++ b/tab_04_supplements.md @@ -167,7 +167,6 @@ function openSupplementFromURL(evt) {
- {% capture std %}{% include_relative docs/supplements/Glossary.md %}{% endcapture %} - {{ std | replace: '- [ ]', '-' | markdownify }} -
-{% capture std %}{% include_relative docs/supplements/InformationVisualization.md %}{% endcapture %} diff --git a/tab_06_glossary.md b/tab_06_glossary.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..e449987 --- /dev/null +++ b/tab_06_glossary.md @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +--- +layout: default +title: Glossary +permalink: /glossary +--- + +{% include_relative docs/supplements/Glossary.md %} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/tab_06_people.md b/tab_07_people.md similarity index 100% rename from tab_06_people.md rename to tab_07_people.md