Consider making Build solution the default way of working

[Zeioth]

This is just some proposals. Nothing in this discussion form part of the roadmap.

Introduction to the problem

We do provide 3 ways of compiling

• Using the conventional entry point and output of the language
• Using .solution.toml
• Using a build automation utility (make, cmake, gradle..)

The issue is communicational. Many people seem to only be reading the first point and ignoring the other two.

There is another reason to consider this, and it's the fact we currently provide 3 compilations options (build & run, build, and run) when using the conventional entry_point and output, but only one when working with .solution.toml files.

Proposal 1

• Eliminate the option Build solution.
• Instead, make the options build & run, build, and run use .solution.toml by default.

Advantages

• Documentation would be x3 simpler.
• By eliminating the "basic" options, Compiler.nvim advanced features become easier to discover and understand.

Disadvantages

• Users would be obligated to create a .solution.toml file.
• Run this file from interpreted languages would still run of the box without requiring a solution file.
• We would inform users when the current working dir doesn't contain a solution file (so they can create it).
• Alteanatively we could prompt users with nui, or nvim builtin functions to enter the entry point and output (and notify the auto creation of the solution file afterwards).

It sounds bad, but it's probably better than the current "I press compile and it doesn't compile" of people who didn't read the readme.

[Zeioth]

The 3 cases of use we currently have are strong enough to remain. No changes planned.