Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add Columns template options, support InnerBlock templateOptions #16129
Add Columns template options, support InnerBlock templateOptions #16129
Changes from 15 commits
d1d4796
77ca437
13bd06e
989702c
b41b489
502cfcd
7093427
a2988db
cc37d09
398b5f1
3d246ae
068e9bf
8109601
f5b581a
409e48c
ddc187b
60b7c50
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this something we expect to only be used for inner blocks? Is there a use case for the selection screen to be used for pre-configured block attributes?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's a good point. It's unclear to me how this might look from a design perspective, since the current concepts seem to align quite closely with how blocks are arranged (technically aligning to the template option), though I don't see any reason why it couldn't be that the options configure a block's own attributes. It speaks a bit to the original questions about whether this be proposed an enhancement to the Placeholder component rather than to the InnerBlocks component, which could be more easily adapted. I still think we could extract something common regardless.
At least as experimental props, we could still opt toward the Placeholder improvements if own-block attributes option selection pans out to be a good idea to pursue.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not super relevant for this pull request, but is the approach we've taken that we need
role="list"
for everyul
? Especially considering it as a "bug" of a particular browser + screen reader combination, I wonder if this is something we could isolate to a Babel transform, to remove consideration from the individual developer. That, or an inverse ESLint rule to enforce it be applied.Currently, it's far too easy to overlook (evidenced by the fact I'd omitted it in my original proposal).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, I know we did this for the Block Hierarchy as well. yeah, it does seem like we should have a rule for it.