Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[DID Data Object References] "naked DID" is not defined in the paper #118

Open
mwherman2000 opened this issue Mar 1, 2019 · 0 comments
Open

Comments

@mwherman2000
Copy link

mwherman2000 commented Mar 1, 2019

Reference: https://github.com/WebOfTrustInfo/rwot8-barcelona/blob/master/topics-and-advance-readings/DID-Data-Object-References.md

@talltree @ken-ebert "naked DID" is a non-technical term that is not defined in the paper.

Is a "naked DID" simply a did as defined in the proposed ABNF grammar? If so, then I suggest using the term did ...and avoid using/inventing a new, non-technical term.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant