Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Do we want *all* the GADM terms as deprecated? #4

Open
bobular opened this issue May 10, 2021 · 4 comments
Open

Do we want *all* the GADM terms as deprecated? #4

bobular opened this issue May 10, 2021 · 4 comments

Comments

@bobular
Copy link
Collaborator

bobular commented May 10, 2021

Browsing VEuGEO_top_merged.owl in Protege I see a very large number of deprecated terms at the root level.

@zhengj2007
Copy link
Member

The deprecated terms generated when converted VEuGEO OBO to OWL format using the tool. I will ask the tool developer for it.

@bobular
Copy link
Collaborator Author

bobular commented May 10, 2021

Thanks.

I'm trying to edit the OWL file in Protege - seems slow on a 16GB RAM machine (though it doesn't seem to be using a lot of RAM). It might be quicker if those deprecated terms weren't there?

Can we delete them using Protege (or edit the owl file directly)?

I tried deleting 5 and I'm not sure it worked (it's eating CPU for several minutes again) - then it crashed :-(

@bobular
Copy link
Collaborator Author

bobular commented May 10, 2021

Actually it didn't crash Protege - it just made the window size 0x0 - which it is now remembering when I try to start it again. Nightmare.

@zhengj2007
Copy link
Member

I asked the tool developer and was told it is likely caused by OWLAPI OBO to OWL conversion package. I can remove these deprecated terms in the file.

zhengj2007 added a commit that referenced this issue May 10, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants