You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I propose adding a Model Evaluation and Benchmarking System to ML Nexus to help users assess their model performance on standardized datasets and compare it against benchmarked scores. This feature would allow users to evaluate their models’ effectiveness, gain insights into strengths and weaknesses, and better understand how their models rank relative to industry standards.
Core Features:
Standardized Dataset Library: Provide a set of common, standardized datasets for users to evaluate their models.
Ensure datasets are relevant to a range of machine learning tasks like image classification, natural language processing, and more.
Performance Evaluation Metrics: Use multiple evaluation metrics (e.g., accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score) to assess model performance across different aspects.
Allow users to view detailed metrics and analysis for better interpretability and improvement opportunities.
Benchmark Scores Comparison: Present benchmark scores achieved by popular models (e.g., ResNet, BERT) on the same datasets, allowing users to compare their models against top-performing baselines.
Provide visual comparisons (e.g., bar charts, line graphs) to show how user models stack up against benchmarks.
Custom Dataset Support: Allow users to upload their datasets and run them through the evaluation pipeline, generating customized benchmarks for unique datasets.
This feature would be especially useful for users looking to develop models for niche tasks or non-standard datasets.
Leaderboards and Achievements: Create a leaderboard showcasing high-performing models submitted by users, fostering a competitive environment for improvement and recognition.
Implement achievement badges for users reaching specific benchmarks, encouraging ongoing engagement and progress.
This feature would make ML Nexus a more robust platform by offering standardized evaluations and benchmarks, helping users assess and enhance their machine learning models effectively.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks for creating the issue in ML-Nexus!🎉
Before you start working on your PR, please make sure to:
⭐ Star the repository if you haven't already.
Pull the latest changes to avoid any merge conflicts.
Attach before & after screenshots in your PR for clarity.
Include the issue number in your PR description for better tracking.
Don't forget to follow @UppuluriKalyani – Project Admin – for more updates!
Tag @Neilblaze,@SaiNivedh26 for assigning the issue to you.
Happy open-source contributing!☺️
This issue has been automatically closed because it has been inactive for more than 30 days. If you believe this is still relevant, feel free to reopen it or create a new one. Thank you!
I propose adding a Model Evaluation and Benchmarking System to ML Nexus to help users assess their model performance on standardized datasets and compare it against benchmarked scores. This feature would allow users to evaluate their models’ effectiveness, gain insights into strengths and weaknesses, and better understand how their models rank relative to industry standards.
Core Features:
Standardized Dataset Library: Provide a set of common, standardized datasets for users to evaluate their models.
Ensure datasets are relevant to a range of machine learning tasks like image classification, natural language processing, and more.
Performance Evaluation Metrics: Use multiple evaluation metrics (e.g., accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score) to assess model performance across different aspects.
Allow users to view detailed metrics and analysis for better interpretability and improvement opportunities.
Benchmark Scores Comparison: Present benchmark scores achieved by popular models (e.g., ResNet, BERT) on the same datasets, allowing users to compare their models against top-performing baselines.
Provide visual comparisons (e.g., bar charts, line graphs) to show how user models stack up against benchmarks.
Custom Dataset Support: Allow users to upload their datasets and run them through the evaluation pipeline, generating customized benchmarks for unique datasets.
This feature would be especially useful for users looking to develop models for niche tasks or non-standard datasets.
Leaderboards and Achievements: Create a leaderboard showcasing high-performing models submitted by users, fostering a competitive environment for improvement and recognition.
Implement achievement badges for users reaching specific benchmarks, encouraging ongoing engagement and progress.
This feature would make ML Nexus a more robust platform by offering standardized evaluations and benchmarks, helping users assess and enhance their machine learning models effectively.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: