From e074664697c371404039dc91dd5a90f5ad339645 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Lu=C3=ADs=20Marques?= Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2024 18:57:43 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] fixed plannig overhead --- content/_index.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/content/_index.md b/content/_index.md index 18a9498..f0a3170 100644 --- a/content/_index.md +++ b/content/_index.md @@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ The results suggest that using LUCCa's uncertainty estimate improves the success {% end %} -Details about LUCCa's computational overhead (~3 ms per planning step) and its empirical coverage (in agreement with the theoretical bounds) can be found in the full paper (Section `$6$`). We also include visualizations of the local conformal scaling factor in Appendix `$B$`. +Details about LUCCa's computational overhead (~0.3 ms per planning step) and its empirical coverage (in agreement with the theoretical bounds) can be found in the full paper (Section `$6$`). We also include visualizations of the local conformal scaling factor in Appendix `$B$`. # BibTeX (cite this!)