You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 26, 2021. It is now read-only.
The current interface for passing action groups is a key: action group, where the key is the store name. It might be more clear instead to have a dedicated key for action groups that is intelligently used
While this may seem trivial here, it means that action files (which are usually separate) can also dictate the storeName, rather than having those exclusively defined when the engine adds them.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Summary
The current interface for passing action groups is a key: action group, where the key is the store name. It might be more clear instead to have a dedicated key for action groups that is intelligently used
Current
Proposal
While this may seem trivial here, it means that action files (which are usually separate) can also dictate the storeName, rather than having those exclusively defined when the engine adds them.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: