You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi TouK
I have recently been using your tool, and integrating it in a CD pipeline on Jenkins.
During my testing and experimenting with reasonable configurations, I ran sputnik from command line on my local machine (usually on already closed change-sets).
For this purpose, It would have been a great help to have a --dry-run option that did the whole analysis, but skipped reporting back to Gerrit.
I actually started working on a pull-request, and have added the CliOption, but couldn't really figure out the 'correct' way to introduce the "no reporting" part in a generic matter.
Would you consider adding this feature? (I would happily send you my partial pull-request, but it is really only a couple of lines of code, and you can probably write those faster than pulling a PR).
Regards Jan
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Exactly. While I am experimenting with settings or tweaking things like check style settings, I might have to run the tool many times (from the console), and don't want to "spam" Gerrit with comments.
I might also use the option temporarily while setting up Sputnik on a Jenkins pipeline, to make sure the Gerrit triggers and paths are set up correctly.
In the really ideal nice-to-have world, it would be nice if dry-run did some sort of pretty print to the console (like line by line), but not really that important.
Hi TouK
I have recently been using your tool, and integrating it in a CD pipeline on Jenkins.
During my testing and experimenting with reasonable configurations, I ran sputnik from command line on my local machine (usually on already closed change-sets).
For this purpose, It would have been a great help to have a --dry-run option that did the whole analysis, but skipped reporting back to Gerrit.
I actually started working on a pull-request, and have added the CliOption, but couldn't really figure out the 'correct' way to introduce the "no reporting" part in a generic matter.
Would you consider adding this feature? (I would happily send you my partial pull-request, but it is really only a couple of lines of code, and you can probably write those faster than pulling a PR).
Regards Jan
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: