Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Relicense under MIT? #89

Open
8 of 18 tasks
Panquesito7 opened this issue Feb 9, 2024 · 5 comments
Open
8 of 18 tasks

Relicense under MIT? #89

Panquesito7 opened this issue Feb 9, 2024 · 5 comments
Labels
help wanted Extra attention is needed in-discussion question Further information is requested

Comments

@Panquesito7
Copy link
Member

Panquesito7 commented Feb 9, 2024

Description

The GNU LGPLv2.1 is more suited for libraries, and I'm not sure this is the license we want for this project.
We should give the most freedom to everyone without any problems, as long as they give credit.

What do you think about relicensing the whole project under MIT? It's a much more permissive license as well as simple and short. I'm not a lawyer, but I think we need to ask all the contributors to agree to relicense the project under a different license (in this case, MIT).

Contributors that have agreed to relicensing under MIT

Let me know if you agree to this below. Thanks! 🙂

@Panquesito7 Panquesito7 added help wanted Extra attention is needed question Further information is requested in-discussion labels Feb 9, 2024
@Panquesito7
Copy link
Member Author

I'm going to assume the 👍 is a yes. Let me know if I'm wrong, though. Thanks.

@Adi9876
Copy link
Contributor

Adi9876 commented Feb 11, 2024 via email

@0xSumitBanik
Copy link
Contributor

Agreed.

@wenceslas-sanchez
Copy link
Contributor

sgtm

@xeno097
Copy link
Contributor

xeno097 commented Feb 16, 2024

Agree

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
help wanted Extra attention is needed in-discussion question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants