Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Request] Support for custom map style URLs #38

Closed
kristfal opened this issue Jul 4, 2016 · 5 comments
Closed

[Request] Support for custom map style URLs #38

kristfal opened this issue Jul 4, 2016 · 5 comments

Comments

@kristfal
Copy link

kristfal commented Jul 4, 2016

Hey,

I've been following the development of this plugin (really looking forward to seeing #29 and #22 landing).

Right now, the docs doesn't say anything about supporting custom map styles. It is currently only referencing the mapbox-hosted styles.

@EddyVerbruggen is custom styles supported and undocumented, or something that needs work? Preferably, custom styles should be setable as inline JSON on map init. A good second option would be via http:// or file:/// protocols.

@dagatsoin
Copy link

I will investigate it, has I need to put my own style too.

@dagatsoin
Copy link

In fact, it already works on the master branch, just put the url instead the classic style in the exemple. Have you got some trouble with ?

@cusspvz
Copy link
Contributor

cusspvz commented Dec 30, 2016

mapbox style url was already supported on Android but not on iOS.

Issue closed by #66, which implements iOS support for it.

@cusspvz cusspvz closed this as completed Dec 30, 2016
@cusspvz
Copy link
Contributor

cusspvz commented Dec 30, 2016

Should be available on next patch or minor version.

EDIT: Available trough version 1.2.3

@ansarikhurshid786
Copy link

ansarikhurshid786 commented Nov 19, 2018

I am trying to add custom style but application is stoped working and crashed in android.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants