Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Investigate a transition of Mod Workflow to the Spring Way #112

Open
jeremythuff opened this issue Sep 29, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Investigate a transition of Mod Workflow to the Spring Way #112

jeremythuff opened this issue Sep 29, 2023 · 1 comment
Labels

Comments

@jeremythuff
Copy link
Member

jeremythuff commented Sep 29, 2023

Currently Mod Workflow is implemented in our own spring-module-core. In FOLIO most exisitng spring modules have been implemented using the EBSCO spring-way implemenation of spring: https://dev.folio.org/guides/spring-way/

We should identify what would need to be done to transition Mod Workflow to using the spring-way approach.

@kaladay
Copy link

kaladay commented Oct 2, 2023

see also: TAMULib/mod-camunda#218

Sizing might be treated as part of linked issue if investigating both at the same time.

@kaladay kaladay moved this from 👷 In Planning to 🏃 On Sprint in FOLIO Oct 5, 2023
@kaladay kaladay assigned rhundal7 and unassigned rhundal7 Oct 18, 2023
@jeremythuff jeremythuff moved this from 🏃 On Sprint to ⛵ Deploying in FOLIO Oct 26, 2023
@jeremythuff jeremythuff moved this from ⛵ Deploying to 👷 In Planning in FOLIO Oct 26, 2023
@jeremythuff jeremythuff moved this from 👷 In Planning to 📋 Backlog in FOLIO Nov 30, 2023
kaladay added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 12, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
Status: 📋 Backlog
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants