Replies: 1 comment
-
Partially solved in #248 The PR adds support for the |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
I was wondering whether it would be a good idea to pick from one of two mutually exclusive operating modes:
I have an ESPHome valve controller which would greatly benefit from having manual control in case HA, wifi or Zigbee is down for some reason (especially when they are down intermittently). To do this, I'd like to expose a bunch of numbers from ESPHome, each controlling a slow PWM signal for one heating coil. Internally, ESPHome would handle the turning on/off of valves based on that PWM signal.
In this particular case, the PID thermostat would not have access to a switch/valve, but rather dictate what width the PWM controller should output, in sync with the
climate
entity'scontrol_output
attribute. That value would be assigned to a singlenumber
entity exposed by ESPHome.If I ever needed manual control for some reason, the ESPHome device would simply follow a default PWM fill rate, not dictated by the thermostat.
When controlling just the output, there would be no control of actual
heater
actuator.If this idea is approved, I can contribute with the actual implementation.
Possibly related to #173
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions