You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The current design, Mongo.jl overloads some Base functions in order to implement mongo operators.
In my opinion, this is a bad idea. For instance, the definition of in clashes with the definition in Compat, since it is defined for in(::Any).
I would like to propose to use a different namespace for Mongo operators, instead of overloading functions from Base.
Another possibility, preferable in my opinion, is to refactor these definitions to multiple-dispatch to a data-structure that is defined in this package. This way Base functions may be overloaded safely.
WARNING: Method definition in(Any) in module Compat at /Users/felipenoris/.julia/v0.6/Compat/src/Compat.jl:912 overwritten in module Mongo at /Users/felipenoris/.julia/v0.6/Mongo/src/query.jl:21.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The current design, Mongo.jl overloads some
Base
functions in order to implement mongo operators.In my opinion, this is a bad idea. For instance, the definition of
in
clashes with the definition in Compat, since it is defined forin(::Any)
.I would like to propose to use a different namespace for Mongo operators, instead of overloading functions from
Base
.Another possibility, preferable in my opinion, is to refactor these definitions to multiple-dispatch to a data-structure that is defined in this package. This way Base functions may be overloaded safely.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: