Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Provide choice of fitting cost function beyond Chi2 (Trac #465) #599

Open
butlerpd opened this issue Mar 30, 2019 · 1 comment
Open

Provide choice of fitting cost function beyond Chi2 (Trac #465) #599

butlerpd opened this issue Mar 30, 2019 · 1 comment
Labels
Enhancement Feature requests and/or general improvements Fitting Perspective Concerns the fitting perspective Major Big change in the code or important change in behaviour

Comments

@butlerpd
Copy link
Member

butlerpd commented Mar 30, 2019

Megan Robertson's group from the Universtiy of Houston has indicated the need to use alternate cost functions to the current Chi^2^. This relates mostly to having features in different q ranges that are not always captured if the uncertainties vary widely between q ranges. One should be careful in doing this of course. On the other hand it is clear that if we are ever to have successful co-refinement of SAXS and SANS we will need to do something. Most likely in fact weighting cost function differently for different curves?

Migrated from http://trac.sasview.org/ticket/465

{
    "status": "new",
    "changetime": "2016-03-20T22:47:52",
    "_ts": "2016-03-20 22:47:52.027781+00:00",
    "description": "Megan Robertson's group from the Universtiy of Houston has indicated the need to use alternate cost functions to the current Chi^2^.  This relates mostly to having features in different q ranges that are not always captured if the uncertainties vary widely between q ranges.  One should be careful in doing this of course.  On the other hand it is clear that if we are ever to have successful co-refinement of SAXS and SANS we will need to do something.  Most likely in fact weighting cost function differently for different curves?",
    "reporter": "butler",
    "cc": "",
    "resolution": "",
    "workpackage": "SasView Fitting Redesign",
    "time": "2015-10-17T19:50:24",
    "component": "SasView",
    "summary": "Provide choice of fitting cost function beyond Chi2",
    "priority": "major",
    "keywords": "",
    "milestone": "SasView Next Release +1",
    "owner": "",
    "type": "enhancement"
}
@butlerpd butlerpd added this to the SasView Next Release +1 milestone Mar 30, 2019
@butlerpd butlerpd added Enhancement Feature requests and/or general improvements Incomplete Migration Major Big change in the code or important change in behaviour and removed Incomplete Migration labels Mar 30, 2019
@butlerpd
Copy link
Member Author

Trac update at 2016/03/20 22:47:52:

  • butler changed description from "Megan Robertson's group from the Universtiy of Houston has indicated the need to use alternate cost functions to the current Chi^2. This relates mostly to having features in different q ranges that are not always captured if the uncertainties vary widely between q ranges. One should be careful in doing this of course. On the other hand it is clear that if we are ever to have successful co-refinement of SAXS and SANS we will need to do something. Most likely in fact weighting cost function differently for different curves?" to "Megan Robertson's group from the Universtiy of Houston has indicated the need to use alternate cost functions to the current Chi^2^. This relates mostly to having features in different q ranges that are not always captured if the uncertainties vary widely between q ranges. One should be careful in doing this of course. On the other hand it is clear that if we are ever to have successful co-refinement of SAXS and SANS we will need to do something. Most likely in fact weighting cost function differently for different curves?"
  • butler changed milestone from "SasView 4.0.0" to "SasView Next Release +1"

@lucas-wilkins lucas-wilkins added Fitting Perspective Concerns the fitting perspective and removed Migrated from Trac labels Oct 31, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Enhancement Feature requests and/or general improvements Fitting Perspective Concerns the fitting perspective Major Big change in the code or important change in behaviour
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants