Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Process for adding remote users to custom groups #16

Closed
michielbdejong opened this issue Oct 31, 2022 · 2 comments
Closed

Process for adding remote users to custom groups #16

michielbdejong opened this issue Oct 31, 2022 · 2 comments
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@michielbdejong
Copy link
Contributor

Related to #3 ("in milestones 3 / 4 we will use SRAM to edit groups"), but maybe that's not realistic for Custom Groups.

Adding remote users to custom groups is currently not supported of course -
Screenshot 2022-10-31 at 16 42 06

Should this be managed in SRAM or do we need to do some GUI work here? If the latter, in which milestone will we put this, https://github.com/SURFnet/rd-sram-integration/milestone/3 maybe? Then we also have some better overview of the workflow and who switches when between RD GUI and SRAM GUI (presumably end-user only uses RD GUI and SRAM GUI is only used by site admins?)

@michielbdejong michielbdejong added the question Further information is requested label Oct 31, 2022
@michielbdejong
Copy link
Contributor Author

SRAM is leading for regular shares
OC is leading for custom shares (not synced to SRAM)

@michielbdejong michielbdejong changed the title Process for adding remote users to custom groups? Process for adding remote users to custom groups Nov 1, 2022
@michielbdejong
Copy link
Contributor Author

Let's discuss in today's standup whether we could also make SRAM leading for both group types. We will need some sort of AAI in the back to make sure all node have the same list of federated groups, otherwise #14 isn't going to work.

Maybe we can have a distinction between local custom shares and SRAM-federated custom shares?

@thepeak99 thepeak99 closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Jun 12, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants