Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Investigate alternative to conda #1969

Closed
akenmorris opened this issue Dec 6, 2022 · 4 comments
Closed

Investigate alternative to conda #1969

akenmorris opened this issue Dec 6, 2022 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@akenmorris
Copy link
Contributor

Relying on conda as part of the ShapeWorks install has resulted in continual installation headaches for users. Released versions of ShapeWorks that once worked can no longer be installed after some months due to changes in conda. Hence the need for the 6.3.2 patch release.

Another user is running into this problem:

conda/conda#11795

A considerable amount of maintenance time and effort is being spent on the conda install scripts and in dealing with the frequent problems.

We should investigate a more robust alternative to managing ShapeWorks python packages than conda. Something we have more control over that won't randomly break.

@akenmorris akenmorris self-assigned this Dec 6, 2022
@akenmorris
Copy link
Contributor Author

One possible option to make things easier for windows users:

https://guilhermebs.github.io/CondaNSIS/

@akenmorris
Copy link
Contributor Author

For Linux (and maybe mac?):

https://conda.github.io/conda-pack/

@akenmorris
Copy link
Contributor Author

I believe the solution is to follow what Slicer has done and just bundle python and the packages we use as part of ShapeWorks.

@akenmorris
Copy link
Contributor Author

Closing this issue as the investigation is complete. Action item is #2289.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant