You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
displayed: Boys Trinity Choir of Men and Girls (Princeton)
expect: Trinity Choir of Men, Boys and Girls (Princeton)
There is a similar anomaly in earlier playlists:
displayed: Cambridge Choir of King's College
expect: Choir of King's College, Cambridge
Proposed solution: In both cases, there is an 'of' in the would-be surname. Perhaps such names could be excluded from mangling? Similarly, both 'surnames' are quite long (4 words each), which is not particularly customary. Perhaps surnames exceeding one or two words could be excluded as well?
On Aug 11, 2020, at 04:57, Jim Mason ***@***.***> wrote:
The 'last, first' name swapping logic is still inappropriately mangling certain artist names. For example,
In @romain2k's latest playlist, we see:
displayed: Boys Trinity Choir of Men and Girls (Princeton)
expect: Trinity Choir of Men, Boys and Girls (Princeton)
There is a similar anomaly in earlier playlists:
displayed: Cambridge Choir of King's College
expect: Choir of King's College, Cambridge
Proposed solution: In both cases, there is an 'of' in the would-be surname. Perhaps such names could be excluded from mangling? Similarly, both 'surnames' are quite long (4 words each), which is not particularly customary. Perhaps surnames exceeding one or two words could be excluded as well?
References:
https://zookeeper.stanford.edu/?action=viewDate&seq=selList&playlist=40744https://zookeeper.stanford.edu/?action=viewDate&seq=selList&playlist=40597
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
The 'last, first' name swapping logic is still inappropriately mangling certain artist names. For example,
In @romain2k's latest playlist, we see:
There is a similar anomaly in earlier playlists:
Proposed solution: In both cases, there is an 'of' in the would-be surname. Perhaps such names could be excluded from mangling? Similarly, both 'surnames' are quite long (4 words each), which is not particularly customary. Perhaps surnames exceeding one or two words could be excluded as well?
References:
https://zookeeper.stanford.edu/?action=viewDate&seq=selList&playlist=40744
https://zookeeper.stanford.edu/?action=viewDate&seq=selList&playlist=40597
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: