You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hello,
we wanted to compute the persistence diagram of the image between 2 filtrations, and the branch https://github.com/Ripser/ripser/tree/image-persistence-simple looked promising. However, it looks like it is based on an old version of Ripser before sparse distance matrices were introduced, and our (very sparse) matrices are too large for a dense representation.
Do you think it is mostly a matter of merging the 2 branches (which may be much more work than git merge but should remain relatively straightforward), or is there something in the image algorithm that is likely to behave badly with sparse distance matrices?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello,
we wanted to compute the persistence diagram of the image between 2 filtrations, and the branch https://github.com/Ripser/ripser/tree/image-persistence-simple looked promising. However, it looks like it is based on an old version of Ripser before sparse distance matrices were introduced, and our (very sparse) matrices are too large for a dense representation.
Do you think it is mostly a matter of merging the 2 branches (which may be much more work than
git merge
but should remain relatively straightforward), or is there something in the image algorithm that is likely to behave badly with sparse distance matrices?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: