Bringing back RDFa support to RDFLib #1582
Replies: 2 comments 7 replies
-
Can we describe what the incompatibilities are with RDFLib 5+? The only problem I see in the linked issue is that |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
And, on reflection, the branch could be fairly straightforwardly reworked as a plugin, using the same approach as the plugin stores. Despite the branch name, I wasn't thinking of proposing it be returned to RDFLib core, I was just checking the feasibility of getting it working at all. Documentation needs work and it could use some better/more extensive tests. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
RDFa support was dropped from RDFLib since RDFLib version 5.0. There have been changes to the RDFLib 5.0 which breaks its compatibility with pyRDFa3, and unfortunately, there is currently no plan on maintaining its compatibility according to the discussion on pyRDFa3's GitHub page. I think It would be great to bring RDFa compatibility back to the current version. Thank you!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions