You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
At the moment rdflib provides a RDF collection as rdf:first/rest triples. A store, which really requires a collection (i.e. list), has to parse such triples again. This is inconvenient and slow.
Would it be possible to add a configuration option to the store interface, which would say that a store accepts collections as lists and then a parser would provide any RDF collection as a Python list?
This discussion was converted from issue #791 on December 25, 2021 19:34.
Heading
Bold
Italic
Quote
Code
Link
Numbered list
Unordered list
Task list
Attach files
Mention
Reference
Menu
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
At the moment
rdflib
provides a RDF collection asrdf:first/rest
triples. A store, which really requires a collection (i.e. list), has to parse such triples again. This is inconvenient and slow.Would it be possible to add a configuration option to the store interface, which would say that a store accepts collections as lists and then a parser would provide any RDF collection as a Python list?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions