You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In line with PR #65 and the recommendation over at #68 (comment) by @Gelbpunkt, we'll try supporting custom JSON encoders in a more tightly integrated / cleaner manner in the new rewrite.
Possible alternative serialisers would be orjson and ujson.
Considerations of note
Due to orjson being a BSON serialiser, and Lavalink not accepting bytes, we should ensure we don't just focus on a basic swap of dumps, as we'll need to convert to unicode when testing orjson but shouldn't attempt to encode where unnecessary.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In line with PR #65 and the recommendation over at #68 (comment) by @Gelbpunkt, we'll try supporting custom JSON encoders in a more tightly integrated / cleaner manner in the new rewrite.
Possible alternative serialisers would be orjson and ujson.
Considerations of note
Due to orjson being a BSON serialiser, and Lavalink not accepting bytes, we should ensure we don't just focus on a basic swap of
dumps
, as we'll need to convert to unicode when testing orjson but shouldn't attempt to encode where unnecessary.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: