You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi, there appear to be some visual differences between the Bootstrap and non-Bootstrap versions of the templates. For example, the downard arrow by "Find Info For" appears thicker in the Bootstrap version. Also, the vertical bar next to the Purdue logo appears thicker in the Bootstrap version. As a general question, are these kinds of discrepancies intentional?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We did make the conscious decision to use font awesome icons where we had previously used other methods such as the down arrow which used to be a regular character or the hamburger menu icon which used to be the 3 div method.
Other slight changes may have been the result of consulting our designer for review throughout development and the slight tweaks she wanted that she otherwise may not have suggested had she not specifically been reviewing the old templates. We've also had the extra design change layer from doing the branding update where she would have had extra look & feel updates.
Hi, there appear to be some visual differences between the Bootstrap and non-Bootstrap versions of the templates. For example, the downard arrow by "Find Info For" appears thicker in the Bootstrap version. Also, the vertical bar next to the Purdue logo appears thicker in the Bootstrap version. As a general question, are these kinds of discrepancies intentional?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: