You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
NRS live births, NRS stillbirths and GRO infant deaths on smra all have three fields that uniquely identify records, when combined. At the moment analysts have to manually combine the fields to create the triplicate ID, and add a prefix to indicate whether it relates to a live or stillbirth. Whilst it is not onerous to do manually, there is potential for error in the padding of fields, or for the prefix not to be added, which becomes a problem if working with both live and stillbirths records so it would be safer to have a standard field.
Describe the solution you'd like
A function to concatenate the three fields together. The user will have to specify in the function which database they are using to apply the correct prefix. Field names need to be specifiable (although function could also contain default names from the databases).
I can write the function but will need help with documentation, testing etc.
Describe alternatives you've considered
Additional context
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
NRS live births, NRS stillbirths and GRO infant deaths on smra all have three fields that uniquely identify records, when combined. At the moment analysts have to manually combine the fields to create the triplicate ID, and add a prefix to indicate whether it relates to a live or stillbirth. Whilst it is not onerous to do manually, there is potential for error in the padding of fields, or for the prefix not to be added, which becomes a problem if working with both live and stillbirths records so it would be safer to have a standard field.
Describe the solution you'd like
A function to concatenate the three fields together. The user will have to specify in the function which database they are using to apply the correct prefix. Field names need to be specifiable (although function could also contain default names from the databases).
I can write the function but will need help with documentation, testing etc.
Describe alternatives you've considered
Additional context
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: