You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We have a ticket for comprehensive data entry in #2183
But we could also envision something smaller. It could be as simple as adding a checkbox when validating (or updating via the new Validate) or adding a label to indicate that what you're reporting is based on a physical audit. For example, OSM has a "sources" attribute that you can include when you're saving a changeset.
Like with #2183, it seems like a low priority because it won't be used frequently, but wanted to point out a more lightweight version of doing this. We had someone recently who asked about how they could do this, since they were auditing a route that they knew well.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We have a ticket for comprehensive data entry in #2183
But we could also envision something smaller. It could be as simple as adding a checkbox when validating (or updating via the new Validate) or adding a label to indicate that what you're reporting is based on a physical audit. For example, OSM has a "sources" attribute that you can include when you're saving a changeset.
Like with #2183, it seems like a low priority because it won't be used frequently, but wanted to point out a more lightweight version of doing this. We had someone recently who asked about how they could do this, since they were auditing a route that they knew well.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: