what authors are in the catalog that aren't in the AAE spreadsheet?

[cwulfman]

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1RHN6KBulDGbpKATLU6PtwU4o5xVsaBB6xbQRtKjMyWE/edit?usp=sharing

[cwulfman]

Here they are: there are 464 of them.
missing.xml.zip

[AlisonBabeu]

Thanks so much for this @cwulfman I plan to add them all to the spreadsheet.

[cwulfman]

Let me know when they're in there!

[cwulfman]

Oops. Those are just the Greek authors. Let me run the Latin authors, too...

[cwulfman]

Here are the missing Latin authors.

missing_latin.xml.zip

[AlisonBabeu]

Hi @cwulfman I think something may have gone a bit wonky with the Latin authors, as I"m finding many of the Latin authors in this list in the AAE spreadsheet (e.g. Acholius, Actorius Naso), in fact as I go through this list, it seems that many of them can be found on the Latin spreadsheet.

[cwulfman]

Hmm. Not surprising. I'll look at it.

[cwulfman]

@AlisonBabeu While tracking this down, I've discovered a couple of wonky phi ids:

Novius (author.1000.1) has <mads:identifier type="phi">592.1</mads:identifier> (And the related-work id looks wrong, too)

Hirtius (author.744.1) has <mads:identifier type="phi">530.1</mads:identifier>

[AlisonBabeu]

Done and done.

[AlisonBabeu]

Fixed that is. Sigh.

[cwulfman]

Thanks. I'll get back to this this afternoon.

[cwulfman]

@AlisonBabeu The STOA field in the Latin Authors spreadsheet is considerably dirtier than the TLG column in the Greek Authors sheet. I'll keep tweaking my scripts to work around it, but I thought you might want to know: there are tons of "invalid ids" in there (i.e., those that don't follow the "stoaN+-stoaN+" pattern). I've attached the XML version, which makes the discrepancies easier to spot using Oxygen.

LatinAuthors.xml.zip](https://github.com/PerseusDL/perseus_catalog/files/1658023/LatinAuthors.xml.zip)

[AlisonBabeu]

Hi @cwulfman I'm currently going through the list in Oxygen, as one type of example, do you mean the various STOA IDs with letters in them like this "stoa0022-stoa055m", those are invalid in a sense I suppose, but I used letters in a number of cases to stick works alphabetically into authors lists of works (such as Augustine), but then found I couldn't do it consistently. I should have just kept adding works without letters and stuck with numbers but this is of course the problem when one person creates all the IDs.

[cwulfman]

No-- I mean ids like these:

1
1
516
966
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
none?
stoa001
stoa0028a
stoa0032a
stoa0101a-sto001
stoa0101a-sto002
stoa0196c-sto002
stoa0255-various
stoa0304
stoa0324
stoa0324
stoa0324
stoa0324
stoa0324
stoa0324
stoa0324
stoa0324
stoa0324
stoa0324
stoa0324
stoa0324
stoa0324
stoa0324
stoa0324
stoa0324
stoa0324
stoa0324
stoa0324
stoa0324
stoa0324
stoa0324
stoa0324
stoa0324
stoa0324
stoa0324
stoa0324
stoa0324
stoa0324
stoa0324
stoa0324
stoa0324
stoa0324
stoa0324
stoa0324
stoa0324
stoa0324
stoa0327
stoa0340-unassigned
stoa0341-unassigned
stoa0342
stoa0344
stoa0344
stoa0361a

[perseuscatalog]

Yikes, I hadn't gotten to those yet. I'll keep looking Alison Babeu Digital Librarian Perseus Digital Library

…

________________________________ From: Cliff Wulfman [[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2018 9:47 AM To: PerseusDL/perseus_catalog Cc: Subscribed Subject: Re: [PerseusDL/perseus_catalog] what authors are in the catalog that aren't in the AAE spreadsheet? (#61) No-- I mean ids like these: 1 1 516 966 a a a a a a a a a a n n n n n n n n n n none? stoa001 stoa0028a stoa0032a stoa0101a-sto001 stoa0101a-sto002 stoa0196c-sto002 stoa0255-various stoa0304 stoa0324 stoa0324 stoa0324 stoa0324 stoa0324 stoa0324 stoa0324 stoa0324 stoa0324 stoa0324 stoa0324 stoa0324 stoa0324 stoa0324 stoa0324 stoa0324 stoa0324 stoa0324 stoa0324 stoa0324 stoa0324 stoa0324 stoa0324 stoa0324 stoa0324 stoa0324 stoa0324 stoa0324 stoa0324 stoa0324 stoa0324 stoa0324 stoa0324 stoa0324 stoa0324 stoa0324 stoa0324 stoa0327 stoa0340-unassigned stoa0341-unassigned stoa0342 stoa0344 stoa0344 stoa0361a — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#61 (comment)>, or mute the thread<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AIlPR2hje3lDhjymWrpsgLqxUJ-yXnkPks5tN0KegaJpZM4RoQBZ>.

[AlisonBabeu]

In a few cases these can just be ignored, when there is a top level STOA ID without a separate work level ID, that is often because there isn't one. For example, in the case of stoa0324, that is a top level ID (in this case for the Scriptores Historiae Augustae) where there aren't individual work level IDs just a top level textgroup. For many works/textgroups where there were individual PHI IDs I didn't bother to also create individual STOA Work level IDs as well.

[AlisonBabeu]

So hi @cwulfman I've gone through the list both in Oxygen and in a Google Sheet and I can't find any "n" or "1" or "a" in any of the STOA ID fields. Am I missing something?

[cwulfman]

I was doing some pre-processing on those ids, and my pre-processing chopped things up wrong; sorry about that. Here's an improved list:

<STOA_>stoa0361a</STOA_>
<STOA_>stoa0028a.stoa001</STOA_>
<STOA_>stoa0032a</STOA_>
<STOA_>n.a.</STOA_>
<STOA_>stoa0324</STOA_>
<STOA_>stoa0324</STOA_>
<STOA_>stoa0324</STOA_>
<STOA_>stoa0324</STOA_>
<STOA_>stoa0324</STOA_>
<STOA_>stoa0324</STOA_>
<STOA_>stoa0324</STOA_>
<STOA_>stoa0324</STOA_>
<STOA_>stoa0324</STOA_>
<STOA_>stoa0324</STOA_>
<STOA_>stoa0304</STOA_>
<STOA_>stoa0344</STOA_>
<STOA_>stoa0101a-sto001</STOA_>
<STOA_>stoa0101a-sto002</STOA_>
<STOA_>516.1</STOA_>
<STOA_>n.a.</STOA_>
<STOA_>n.a.</STOA_>
<STOA_>n.a.</STOA_>
<STOA_>n.a.</STOA_>
<STOA_>n.a.</STOA_>
<STOA_>n.a.</STOA_>
<STOA_>n.a.</STOA_>
<STOA_>n.a.</STOA_>
<STOA_>stoa0327</STOA_>
<STOA_/>
<STOA_/>
<STOA_/>
<STOA_>stoa0324</STOA_>
<STOA_>stoa0324</STOA_>
<STOA_>stoa0324</STOA_>
<STOA_>stoa0324</STOA_>
<STOA_>stoa0196c-sto002</STOA_>
<STOA_>none?</STOA_>
<STOA_>966.1</STOA_>
<STOA_/>
<STOA_/>
<STOA_>stoa0340-unassigned</STOA_>
<STOA_>stoa0341-unassigned</STOA_>
<STOA_>stoa0342</STOA_>
<STOA_/>
<STOA_/>
<STOA_/>
<STOA_>stoa0344</STOA_>
<STOA_/>
<STOA_>stoa0255-various</STOA_>
<STOA_>stoa0324</STOA_>
<STOA_>stoa0324</STOA_>
<STOA_>stoa0324</STOA_>
<STOA_>stoa0324</STOA_>
<STOA_>stoa0324</STOA_>
<STOA_>stoa0324</STOA_>
<STOA_>stoa0324</STOA_>
<STOA_>stoa0324</STOA_>
<STOA_>stoa0324</STOA_>
<STOA_>stoa0324</STOA_>
<STOA_>stoa0324</STOA_>
<STOA_/>
<STOA_>n.a.</STOA_>
<STOA_>stoa0324</STOA_>
<STOA_>stoa0324</STOA_>
<STOA_>stoa0324</STOA_>
<STOA_>stoa0324</STOA_>
<STOA_>stoa0324</STOA_>
<STOA_>stoa0324</STOA_>
<STOA_>stoa0324</STOA_>
<STOA_>stoa0324</STOA_>
<STOA_>stoa0324</STOA_>
<STOA_>stoa0324</STOA_>
<STOA_>stoa0324</STOA_>
<STOA_>stoa0324</STOA_>

[AlisonBabeu]

Hi @cwulfman I think I fixed all of these. I've changed n.a. to none, fixed a few places where a PHI was in STOA, deleted a few empty rows causing issues, and added work level STOA IDs where relevant. Can you just ignore stoa0324, I don't want to number all of those individual works since they have PHIs. Thanks!

[cwulfman]

Sure thing. Thanks!