Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Remove mbedEdgeTrace and nanostack libraries #71

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Remove mbedEdgeTrace and nanostack libraries #71

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

whygoyal
Copy link
Contributor

@whygoyal whygoyal requested a review from a team September 24, 2021 06:21
JanneKiiskila
JanneKiiskila approved these changes Sep 27, 2021
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Collaborator

@JanneKiiskila JanneKiiskila left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

@whygoyal whygoyal force-pushed the remove-mbedEdgeTrace-nanostack branch from c251ad5 to 1262b41 Compare October 14, 2021 05:24
@JanneKiiskila
Copy link
Collaborator

PR title is likely misleading, it's not removing them - it's just pulling them in via a different way.

@whygoyal whygoyal force-pushed the remove-mbedEdgeTrace-nanostack branch from 19d3c2c to f97e19d Compare November 11, 2021 20:24
petedyerarm
petedyerarm approved these changes Nov 15, 2022
View reviewed changes
Copy link

@petedyerarm petedyerarm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@petedyerarm petedyerarm petedyerarm approved these changes

@JanneKiiskila JanneKiiskila JanneKiiskila approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@whygoyal @JanneKiiskila @petedyerarm