Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

train w/o pre-trained backbone #82

Open
StarsMyDestination opened this issue Apr 22, 2021 · 3 comments
Open

train w/o pre-trained backbone #82

StarsMyDestination opened this issue Apr 22, 2021 · 3 comments

Comments

@StarsMyDestination
Copy link

Hi, thank you for this excellent work first!
Have you tried to train the model from scratch? I observed some strange things:

  1. the mAP is much lower than reported (in fact mAP<30);
  2. the init proposals not learned well, and I visualized it to find that the init boxes barely changed even the training process was finished.

Any ideas? thx a lot ^_^

@StarsMyDestination
Copy link
Author

Actually, I printed the 'init_proposal_boxes.weight' of your provided model r50_100pro_3x_model.pth, and the boxes are not distributed as the paper says:
image
above image is snipped from paper.

image
the actual proposal boxes in the provided pth file, and it almost the same, obviously not randomly distributed on the image to cover the whole image area.

Is there any details not illustrated in the paper or I misunderstood something?
If not, how to explain this?

@PeizeSun
Copy link
Owner

Hi~
For training the model from scratch, we didn't try it. I guess it may need more training epochs.
For the init boxes, please see this issue: link.

@StarsMyDestination
Copy link
Author

@PeizeSun thx for your reply.
I will first try the random init, if I find something I will leave a comment here,

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants