You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Describe the bug
We performed single cell RNA sequencing using 10x 5p captures, Mas Isoseq library preparation and sequencing on Revio system. Everything is working fine, but for some genes I have a dominant isoform that has one extra exon that does not exist. This extra exon is included in the isoform even if it is present in only one read (over more that 15000).
After filtering this isoform is discarded (considered as RTS) and the counts of the gene are near 0...
Maybe adding a threshold including a minimal coverage to keep or not an extra exon and collapse it to FSM isoform would be helpful.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
How long is that extra exon? There are thresholds how much "extra" we accept on each flank during clustering. Since clustering is reference-free, isoseq has no notion of exons, but only partial matches.
Thank you for getting in touch and sorry for the late answer :-) I was in a congress this beginning of the week and quite busy.
The extra-exon is 126nt long and in 5p position. I checked and there is only one molecule/read that have this exon/intron sequence (which is a full splice match for Wt1 transcript) and this extra exon with all same boundaries.
But all molecules that don't have this extra exon and that have canonical exon introns were associated to this isoform.
I counted in my dataset, I have >106k isoforms with more exons than reference accounting for around 12.5% of our deduplicated reads. I have not calculated yet which ones had extra 5p exon though, so it might be lot fewer.
I wonder how could we check for all clusters that there is kind of an uniformity in the coverage of the isof. To ensure that just one or two reads (compared to thousands that are canonical) with one extra exon do not create a new artifactual and undescribed isoform.
#There are thresholds how much "extra" we accept on each flank during clustering -> Do you mean exons or nt ?
Operating system
UNIX
Package name
isoseq
Describe the bug
We performed single cell RNA sequencing using 10x 5p captures, Mas Isoseq library preparation and sequencing on Revio system. Everything is working fine, but for some genes I have a dominant isoform that has one extra exon that does not exist. This extra exon is included in the isoform even if it is present in only one read (over more that 15000).
After filtering this isoform is discarded (considered as RTS) and the counts of the gene are near 0...
Maybe adding a threshold including a minimal coverage to keep or not an extra exon and collapse it to FSM isoform would be helpful.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: