Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Define CNV genotype strategy #19

Open
ctsa opened this issue Aug 24, 2023 · 4 comments
Open

Define CNV genotype strategy #19

ctsa opened this issue Aug 24, 2023 · 4 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@ctsa
Copy link
Member

ctsa commented Aug 24, 2023

HiFiCNV currently outputs 0/1 as a placeholder GT value for all cases. Set policy to either make this unknown or provide a consistent interpretation of copy number as GT.

@ctsa ctsa added the enhancement New feature or request label Aug 24, 2023
@ctsa ctsa mentioned this issue Aug 24, 2023
@mrvollger
Copy link

Hi @ctsa, I have a related question here, I think.

Do you have any plans to make the CNV caller hap aware if the input is a haplotagged bam from hiphase for example? Similar to how your pb-cpg-tools works.

I think it would make an excellent addition ;)

@ctsa
Copy link
Member Author

ctsa commented Dec 15, 2023

Thanks Mitchell, Are you thinking of allele-specific copy number output for duplications? If so, we might be able to do it with the current MAF input. Would be interested in knowing more about the application you have in mind.

@mrvollger
Copy link

Yeah exactly. I want to explore if there are allele-specific dosage effects for certain genes in a cancer line we are studying.

An example might be: hap2 has gained an allele-specific variant in gene X, but also has a CN change of Y. Is the allele-specific variant having an impact on gene dosage beyond the CN change in the haplotype?

@ctsa
Copy link
Member Author

ctsa commented Dec 15, 2023

Thanks, good to know about the case you're thinking of. We're probably a few steps away from what you describe due to generally limited support for somatic CNA calling. The most directly applicable of these is that we're limiting classifications of duplications to a simple "CN 5 or greater" state on the top end. This together with the lack of a purity/ploidy estimation/correction model mean we would have some ground to cover before we could make allele-specific CN very useful in a somatic context directly in HiFiCNV.

We have some separate tooling recommendations for this problem but these are moving pretty quickly, so let me connect you into a separate discussion to make sure I'm getting you the most up to date info.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants