-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 48
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
super-wide test projecct #178
Comments
Sure thing. Not sure if I can get to it today, but I will try. |
It's going to take me a long time to create all of those variables. |
...and even longer to enter the data. |
Would it help to autopopulate it in Excel (with sequencing) or R (and output the variable names to a csv)? |
I don't trust those newfangled capabilities. The only way to do something right is through a little sweat equity. |
including super-wide-dictionary and super-wide-data for testing Reference #178
Closing this issue and expressing my sincerest apologies for not using my sarcasm font on my previous comments. Shame on me. |
@thomasnwilson, related to the problems we had the other week, can you create a super wide (and short) test project on the bbmc instance?
Besides
record_id
, could you add 3000 column names that follow the patterntediously_long_variable_name_0001
...tediously_long_variable_name_3000
. Include a single populated row, where the 3000 cells are populated sequentially 1 through 3,000. That way, we have more assurance that the cells aren't being shifted.I hope we don't have to start batching both horizontally and vertically. That's probably enough motivation to develop the EAV routine more (See #145)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: