Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

super-wide test projecct #178

Closed
wibeasley opened this issue Nov 30, 2017 · 6 comments
Closed

super-wide test projecct #178

wibeasley opened this issue Nov 30, 2017 · 6 comments
Assignees

Comments

@wibeasley
Copy link
Member

@thomasnwilson, related to the problems we had the other week, can you create a super wide (and short) test project on the bbmc instance?

Besides record_id, could you add 3000 column names that follow the pattern tediously_long_variable_name_0001 ... tediously_long_variable_name_3000. Include a single populated row, where the 3000 cells are populated sequentially 1 through 3,000. That way, we have more assurance that the cells aren't being shifted.

I hope we don't have to start batching both horizontally and vertically. That's probably enough motivation to develop the EAV routine more (See #145)

@thomasnwilson
Copy link
Member

@wibeasley

Sure thing. Not sure if I can get to it today, but I will try.

@thomasnwilson
Copy link
Member

It's going to take me a long time to create all of those variables.

@thomasnwilson
Copy link
Member

...and even longer to enter the data.

@wibeasley

@wibeasley
Copy link
Member Author

Would it help to autopopulate it in Excel (with sequencing) or R (and output the variable names to a csv)?

@thomasnwilson
Copy link
Member

I don't trust those newfangled capabilities. The only way to do something right is through a little sweat equity.

thomasnwilson added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 1, 2017
including super-wide-dictionary and super-wide-data for testing

Reference #178
@thomasnwilson
Copy link
Member

Closing this issue and expressing my sincerest apologies for not using my sarcasm font on my previous comments. Shame on me.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants