Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Severe ideological bias #31

Open
burtonsys opened this issue Feb 22, 2017 · 3 comments
Open

Severe ideological bias #31

burtonsys opened this issue Feb 22, 2017 · 3 comments

Comments

@burtonsys
Copy link

burtonsys commented Feb 22, 2017

I ran a list of test cases through bs-detector, and the results were disappointing.

It correctly identified these sites:

http://naturalnews.com/ JUNK SCIENCE
http://endingthefed.com/ EXTREME BIAS
http://realnewsrightnow.com/ FAKE NEWS
https://conservativedailypost.com/ FAKE NEWS
http://nationalreport.net/ FAKE NEWS
http://prntly.com/ FAKE NEWS
http://yournewswire.com/ CLICKBAIT
http://www.thenewsnerd.com/ SATIRE
http://beforeitsnews.com/ FAKE NEWS
http://www.prisonplanet.com/ CONSPIRACY THEORY
http://www.infowars.com/ CONSPIRACY THEORY
http://www.theonion.com/ SATIRE
https://www.rt.com/ STATE NEWS SOURCE

It missed some others:

http://krbcnews.com/ -- not flagged. (this leftist fake news site is impersonating the real KRBC-TV!)
http://therightists.com/ -- not flagged.
http://drrichswier.com/ -- not flagged.
http://usamagazinestudio.com/ -- not flagged.
http://reagancoalition.com/ -- not flagged.
http://principia-scientific.org/ -- not flagged.
https://moneymorning.com/ -- not flagged.

But the list also shows strong leftist bias. It wrongly flagged five excellent, trustworthy conservative sites, four of them for supposed "extreme bias":

http://www.drudgereport.com/ EXTREME BIAS
https://ijr.com/ EXTREME BIAS
http://lifenews.com/ EXTREME BIAS
http://www.dailywire.com/ EXTREME BIAS
http://www.theblaze.com/ CLICKBAIT

But NONE of the far-left sites I checked were flagged. For instance, although the highly respected anti-abortion site LifeNews.com was flagged, I checked about two dozen pro-abortion sites, and none of them were flagged.

A lot of sites are marginal/dubious. Left-wing dubious/marginal sites are never flagged, but dubious/marginal right-wing sites are often flagged:

** These six dubious left-wing sources were not flagged:
https://mediamatters.org/ -- not flagged.
https://www.splcenter.org/ -- not flagged.
http://www.rightwingwatch.org/ -- not flagged.
http://www.hotwhopper.com/ -- not flagged.
https://www.buzzfeed.com/ -- not flagged.
http://www.dailykos.com/ -- not flagged.
** Three of these five dubious right-wing sources were flagged:
http://www.breitbart.com/ CLICKBAIT
http://www.wnd.com/ EXTREME BIAS
http://www.redstate.com/ CLICKBAIT
https://www.newsmax.com/ -- is very similar to WND, yet not flagged.
https://www.thenewamerican.com/ (the Bircher site) -- is the least reliable of the five, yet it wasn't flagged.

@mishmz
Copy link

mishmz commented Mar 30, 2017

A lot of what we've labeled is based on submissions, so thank you for submitting these. I'm adding them to the "to be analyzed" list right now.

@no-identd
Copy link

@burtonsys could you evaluate some articles from the websites whose classification you've contested using the methodology I pointed to in #38?

@ctwardy
Copy link

ctwardy commented May 1, 2018

Presuming that is bs-detector, a browser extension that relies on OpenSourcesGroup for tags. Both projects haven't updated in a year. Superseded by something else maybe?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants