Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

myAmerica Wildlife Tracker #13

Open
BoozAllenDigital opened this issue Apr 2, 2015 · 2 comments
Open

myAmerica Wildlife Tracker #13

BoozAllenDigital opened this issue Apr 2, 2015 · 2 comments

Comments

@BoozAllenDigital
Copy link

Develop a mobile experience for wildlife enthusiasts that mashes up publicly-available data (e.g. RIDB, PADUS, etc.) so they can browse, search, and add their own (e.g. photo, audio, video) wildlife sightings.
Potential features could include:

  • Users can add a new sighting (e.g. tweet w/photo) based on their geo-location, and tag with specific hashtags (e.g. #greatblueheron, #californiacondor #baldeagle)
  • Users can search / browse user-generated sightings based on their specific location, or via a map interface and specific filters
  • Administrators and Staff can scan usage information to improve park experience / management (e.g. wildlife tracking, visitor experience, traffic/crowds)
@ryanbranciforte
Copy link

A nice implementation of this idea in California - http://content.stamen.com/caliparks
http://www.caliparks.org/

@danrademacher
Copy link

social media is one way to do this (thanks for the shout out for CaliParks.org!), but if you want more actionable wildlife data, I'd say go for inaturalist or ebird. iNat has a good API and broad taxonomic coverage: http://www.inaturalist.org/pages/api+reference. eBird has huge amounts of data but (not surprisingly) is just birds, and I haven't ever tried to use the API, though they do have one, https://confluence.cornell.edu/display/CLOISAPI/eBird+API+1.1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants