You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 24, 2019. It is now read-only.
Complexes are composed of other complexes. E.g., HSA-111751.1. I’m not sure that it makes sense to preserve this structure when the complex is formed. Can these be “flattened” down to a single complex of all the components? I can imagine that the current way could result in different ways to represent a complex, for example if A:A:B:B can be assembled by A:A+B:B or by A:B+A:B. If we flatten to a single complex of all components, then we might have to sort alphabetically. On the other hand, there may be complexes that have the same components, but different structures. Not sure what the correct/ideal would be here, so perhaps this is something to be figured out for the BEL specifications.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Complexes are composed of other complexes. E.g., HSA-111751.1. I’m not sure that it makes sense to preserve this structure when the complex is formed. Can these be “flattened” down to a single complex of all the components? I can imagine that the current way could result in different ways to represent a complex, for example if A:A:B:B can be assembled by A:A+B:B or by A:B+A:B. If we flatten to a single complex of all components, then we might have to sort alphabetically. On the other hand, there may be complexes that have the same components, but different structures. Not sure what the correct/ideal would be here, so perhaps this is something to be figured out for the BEL specifications.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: