You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I came across some implements from Kverneland which query the VT's name via the ProductIdentification (64653 PGN):
I have seen in the stack that there is an "OOTB" DiagnosticProtocol implementation, we could leverage as it is (even if it might be overkill) or create a "light" class above it within the stack just serving this particular PGN, or we can just handle this PGN within the VT app.
Almost all Kverneland implements requesting date/time information:
I think it would be beneficial to relay system time through this PGN too.
What do you think would it be useful to support these features?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I came across some implements from Kverneland which query the VT's name via the ProductIdentification (64653 PGN):
I have seen in the stack that there is an "OOTB" DiagnosticProtocol implementation, we could leverage as it is (even if it might be overkill) or create a "light" class above it within the stack just serving this particular PGN, or we can just handle this PGN within the VT app.
Almost all Kverneland implements requesting date/time information:
I think it would be beneficial to relay system time through this PGN too.
What do you think would it be useful to support these features?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: