Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Update how to run a validator to include BoLD #1813

Open
wants to merge 11 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Update how to run a validator to include BoLD #1813

wants to merge 11 commits into from

Conversation

TucksonDev
Copy link
Contributor

@TucksonDev TucksonDev commented Nov 12, 2024 •
edited
Loading

This PR modifies the page "How to run a validator" to:

  • Update its contents
  • Add configuration for BoLD (while keeping the existing configuration)
  • Better clarify how to run a validator for an Orbit chain

To do:

  • How to use the pool contracts (not needed)
  • BoLD API documentation (first draft up, missing examples of all methods)
  • Verify whether we need legacy parameters when BoLD is activated (--node.staker.enable and --node.staker.strategy)

Preview

Closes TW-304

@vercel Vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Nov 12, 2024 •
edited
Loading

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Updated (UTC)
arbitrum-docs ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview Dec 12, 2024 4:43pm

@cla-bot cla-bot bot added the s label Nov 12, 2024
@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Nov 26, 2024 •
edited
Loading

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

@TucksonDev TucksonDev marked this pull request as ready for review December 9, 2024 16:16
anegg0
anegg0 requested changes Dec 12, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@anegg0 anegg0 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Some nits, but they're ready to merge :)

@TucksonDev TucksonDev requested a review from anegg0 December 12, 2024 16:37
anegg0
anegg0 approved these changes Dec 12, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@anegg0 anegg0 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@anegg0 anegg0 anegg0 approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
s
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@TucksonDev @CLAassistant @anegg0